From zawadaa at gmail.com Fri Jul 1 14:04:44 2022 From: zawadaa at gmail.com (Andrzej Zawadzki) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:04:44 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test Message-ID: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> Hi! My KDE is broken after upgrade (plasma-shell, basically useless). How this looks on yours computers? ;-) -- Andrzej From masko at ipipan.waw.pl Fri Jul 1 14:16:54 2022 From: masko at ipipan.waw.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Ma=C5=9Bko?=) Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 14:16:54 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> Message-ID: <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> From which version did you upgrade? Works without major problems for me. -- Pozdrawiam. ?ukasz Ma?ko 1 lip 2022 14:04 Andrzej Zawadzki napisa?(a): Hi! My KDE is broken after upgrade (plasma-shell, basically useless). How this looks on yours computers? ;-) -- Andrzej _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From zawadaa at gmail.com Fri Jul 1 14:31:04 2022 From: zawadaa at gmail.com (Andrzej Zawadzki) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:31:04 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> Message-ID: OK Qt5 was to fresh. I found in logs: *plasmashell[2012]: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (5.15.4) with this library (5.15.5)* Hmm, rebuild is needed? On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:19 PM ?ukasz Ma?ko wrote: > From which version did you upgrade? Works without major problems for > me. > -- > Pozdrawiam. ?ukasz Ma?ko > > 1 lip 2022 14:04 Andrzej Zawadzki napisa?(a): > > Hi! > My KDE is broken after upgrade (plasma-shell, basically useless). > How > this looks on yours computers? ;-) > -- > Andrzej > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > From atler at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 1 17:37:30 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:37:30 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> Message-ID: <20220701153730.ymu7ffqapumzkpkb@pine.lan> On 01.07.2022 14:31, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > OK Qt5 was to fresh. I found in logs: > > > *plasmashell[2012]: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (5.15.4) with this > library (5.15.5)* > Hmm, rebuild is needed? `rpm -qa 'Qt5*' | grep -F 5.15.4` will likely be the reason. Needs upgrade to 5.15.5 as well. > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:19 PM ?ukasz Ma?ko wrote: > > > From which version did you upgrade? Works without major problems for > > me. > > -- > > Pozdrawiam. ?ukasz Ma?ko > > > > 1 lip 2022 14:04 Andrzej Zawadzki napisa?(a): > > > > Hi! > > My KDE is broken after upgrade (plasma-shell, basically useless). > > How > > this looks on yours computers? ;-) > > -- > > Andrzej > > _______________________________________________ > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > > _______________________________________________ > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > > > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl Fri Jul 1 19:22:42 2022 From: ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl (Peri Noid) Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 19:22:42 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> Message-ID: <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> Dnia pi?tek, 1 lipca 2022 14:31:04 CEST Andrzej Zawadzki pisze: > OK Qt5 was to fresh. I found in logs: > > > *plasmashell[2012]: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (5.15.4) with this > library (5.15.5)* > > Hmm, rebuild is needed? I did a full downgrade of Qt5 to 5.15.4 and it works - so yes, the problem is somewhere there. We're still missing some of Qt5 packets in thre 5.15.5 version to be able to upgrade everything to this version. At least now. -- ?ukasz Ma?ko _o) Lukasz.Masko(at)ipipan.waw.pl /\\ Registered Linux User #61028 _\_V Ubuntu: staroafryka?skie s?owo oznaczaj?ce "Nie umiem zainstalowa? Debiana" From drmarwat at gmail.com Thu Jul 7 19:46:23 2022 From: drmarwat at gmail.com (Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 22:46:23 +0500 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Hello, I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel related packages. How to fix this? Thanks , From j.rekorajski at gmail.com Fri Jul 8 11:32:24 2022 From: j.rekorajski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jan_R=C4=99korajski?=) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 11:32:24 +0200 Subject: No subject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: > > Hello, > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel > related packages. > > How to fix this? Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) packages. The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a working kernel. Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel boots before doing so :) -- Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginspld-linux.org From drmarwat at gmail.com Tue Jul 12 16:26:30 2022 From: drmarwat at gmail.com (Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:26:30 +0500 Subject: No subject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks but that did not help either as can be seen from this log poldek:/all-avail> upgrade * error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package Nothing to do poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64 error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package Nothing to do poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package Nothing to do On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jan R?korajski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages > > > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel > > related packages. > > > > How to fix this? > > Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) packages. > > The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would > have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a > working kernel. > Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel > boots before doing so :) > > -- > Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ > bagginspld-linux.org > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > -- Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat Abbottabad Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan Cell # +92333-5393854 WhatsApp # +92333-5393854 Email: drmarwat at gmail.com Web: http://saleem-khan.blogspot.com Registered GNU/Linux User # 413133 Since Aug 2003 From atler at pld-linux.org Tue Jul 12 16:39:52 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:39:52 +0200 Subject: your mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20220712143952.vag4naoi2qcsjzaj@pine.grzadka> On 12.07.2022 19:26, Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: > Thanks but that did not help either > > as can be seen from this log > poldek:/all-avail> upgrade * > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do You may try `just-install` alias in interactive session or `--nohold` command line parameter but I strongly recommend `man poldek` and `man poldek.conf` instead. > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jan R?korajski > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages > > > > > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel > > > related packages. > > > > > > How to fix this? > > > > Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) packages. > > > > The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would > > have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a > > working kernel. > > Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel > > boots before doing so :) > > > > -- > > Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ > > bagginspld-linux.org > > _______________________________________________ > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > > > > > -- > Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat > Abbottabad > Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa > Pakistan > Cell # +92333-5393854 > WhatsApp # +92333-5393854 > Email: drmarwat at gmail.com > Web: http://saleem-khan.blogspot.com > Registered GNU/Linux User # 413133 > Since Aug 2003 > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From atler at pld-linux.org Tue Jul 12 16:41:20 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:41:20 +0200 Subject: your mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20220712144120.texpbkieujrvqlh3@pine.grzadka> On 12.07.2022 19:26, Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: > Thanks but that did not help either > > as can be seen from this log > poldek:/all-avail> upgrade * > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > Nothing to do And please do post such questions on pld-users-en. Thanks. > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jan R?korajski > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages > > > > > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel > > > related packages. > > > > > > How to fix this? > > > > Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) packages. > > > > The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would > > have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a > > working kernel. > > Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel > > boots before doing so :) > > > > -- > > Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ > > bagginspld-linux.org > > _______________________________________________ > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > > > > > -- > Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat > Abbottabad > Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa > Pakistan > Cell # +92333-5393854 > WhatsApp # +92333-5393854 > Email: drmarwat at gmail.com > Web: http://saleem-khan.blogspot.com > Registered GNU/Linux User # 413133 > Since Aug 2003 > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From drmarwat at gmail.com Tue Jul 12 16:44:08 2022 From: drmarwat at gmail.com (Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:44:08 +0500 Subject: your mail In-Reply-To: <20220712144120.texpbkieujrvqlh3@pine.grzadka> References: <20220712144120.texpbkieujrvqlh3@pine.grzadka> Message-ID: Sorry if I posted it in wrong place but I thought I posted it in poldek English section And strangely now there is no more kernel 5.18 available on th , it has disappeared from packages available for upgrade So I'm currently on 5.17 Thanks On Tue, Jul 12, 2022, 7:41 PM Jan Palus wrote: > On 12.07.2022 19:26, Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: > > Thanks but that did not help either > > > > as can be seen from this log > > poldek:/all-avail> upgrade * > > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held > package > > Nothing to do > > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held > package > > Nothing to do > > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 > > > > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package > > Nothing to do > > And please do post such questions on pld-users-en. Thanks. > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jan R?korajski > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages > > > > > > > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel > > > > related packages. > > > > > > > > How to fix this? > > > > > > Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) packages. > > > > > > The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would > > > have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a > > > working kernel. > > > Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel > > > boots before doing so :) > > > > > > -- > > > Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ > > > bagginspld-linux.org > > > _______________________________________________ > > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat > > Abbottabad > > Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa > > Pakistan > > Cell # +92333-5393854 > > WhatsApp # +92333-5393854 > > Email: drmarwat at gmail.com > > Web: http://saleem-khan.blogspot.com > > Registered GNU/Linux User # 413133 > > Since Aug 2003 > > _______________________________________________ > > pld-devel-en mailing list > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > From drmarwat at gmail.com Tue Jul 12 16:45:37 2022 From: drmarwat at gmail.com (Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:45:37 +0500 Subject: your mail In-Reply-To: References: <20220712144120.texpbkieujrvqlh3@pine.grzadka> Message-ID: My bad , I meant PLD English section My mind is stuck with poldek so I wrote poldek by mistake On Tue, Jul 12, 2022, 7:44 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: > Sorry if I posted it in wrong place but I thought I posted it in poldek > English section > > And strangely now there is no more kernel 5.18 available on th , it has > disappeared from packages available for upgrade > > So I'm currently on 5.17 > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022, 7:41 PM Jan Palus wrote: > >> On 12.07.2022 19:26, Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat wrote: >> > Thanks but that did not help either >> > >> > as can be seen from this log >> > poldek:/all-avail> upgrade * >> > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held >> package >> > Nothing to do >> > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 >> > kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64 >> > kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64 >> > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-drm-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-headers-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > error: kernel-sound-alsa-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held >> package >> > Nothing to do >> > poldek:/all-avail> install kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64 >> > >> > error: kernel-5.18.5-1.x86_64: refusing to upgrade held package >> > Nothing to do >> >> And please do post such questions on pld-users-en. Thanks. >> >> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jan R?korajski >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:46 PM Saleem Ceann Khan Marwat >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hello, >> > > > >> > > > I am having issue with kernel upgrade to 5.18 due to held packages >> > > > >> > > > I tried --nodeps --force but still can not upgrade any of the kernel >> > > > related packages. >> > > > >> > > > How to fix this? >> > > >> > > Use install instead of upgrade for held (kernel in this case) >> packages. >> > > >> > > The hold in poldek was added to prevent a case when a new kernel would >> > > have problems starting. Upgrade could possibly leave you without a >> > > working kernel. >> > > Hold will not prevent uninstalling, but make sure that new kernel >> > > boots before doing so :) >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ >> > > bagginspld-linux.org >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > pld-devel-en mailing list >> > > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org >> > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dr.Saleem Khan Marwat >> > Abbottabad >> > Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa >> > Pakistan >> > Cell # +92333-5393854 >> > WhatsApp # +92333-5393854 >> > Email: drmarwat at gmail.com >> > Web: http://saleem-khan.blogspot.com >> > Registered GNU/Linux User # 413133 >> > Since Aug 2003 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > pld-devel-en mailing list >> > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org >> > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en >> _______________________________________________ >> pld-devel-en mailing list >> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org >> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en >> > From qboosh at pld-linux.org Thu Jul 14 16:38:33 2022 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:38:33 +0200 Subject: RFC: shell completions policy change? Message-ID: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested). My proposal: 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and obsoleted). [preferred] Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate bash/zsh dependencies. 2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with commands to complete -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From arekm at maven.pl Thu Jul 14 18:04:13 2022 From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=c5=9bkiewicz?=) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:04:13 +0200 Subject: RFC: shell completions policy change? In-Reply-To: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <33dc3708-89cb-113d-6cbf-a89df2b4b444@maven.pl> On 14.07.2022 16:38, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate > completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested). > > My proposal: > 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper > level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion > files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and > obsoleted). [preferred] > Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate > bash/zsh dependencies. +1 > > 2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with > commands to complete -1 -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) From baggins at pld-linux.org Thu Jul 14 23:27:34 2022 From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:27:34 +0200 Subject: RFC: shell completions policy change? In-Reply-To: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: On Thu, 14 Jul 2022, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate > completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested). > > My proposal: > 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper > level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion > files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and > obsoleted). [preferred] > Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate > bash/zsh dependencies. +1 Yes, it's a pain to find those subpackages. -- Jan R?korajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/ From atler at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 15 14:26:54 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:26:54 +0200 Subject: RFC: shell completions policy change? In-Reply-To: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20220714143833.GB19541@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <20220715122654.jmz2snhwuy344fzp@pine.grzadka> On 14.07.2022 16:38, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate > completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested). > > My proposal: > 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper > level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion > files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and > obsoleted). [preferred] > Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate > bash/zsh dependencies. Never had an issue with finding completions but I'm all for less subpackages so +1. > 2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with > commands to complete > > > -- > Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From baggins at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 22 11:03:54 2022 From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:03:54 +0200 Subject: Qt packaging Message-ID: Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is soooo much easier. No need for bootstrap, no intertwined build dependencies, just configure -> build -> build docs -> install. And unless there is a _very_ good reason to use split sources I'm just going to add a single qt6 package that builds everything (we can still subpackage bineries as we want them). -- Jan R?korajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/ From atler at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 22 11:43:16 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:43:16 +0200 Subject: Qt packaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20220722094316.bwba2bwuldtgnxss@pine.grzadka> On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan R?korajski wrote: > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is soooo much > easier. No need for bootstrap, no intertwined build dependencies, just > configure -> build -> build docs -> install. > > And unless there is a _very_ good reason to use split sources I'm just going > to add a single qt6 package that builds everything (we can still subpackage > bineries as we want them). As long as each component is bcondized and there are no "to the exact release" dependencies then I guess it's fine. Doing qtwebengine (and all the other components) rebuild each time qtbase needs a small packaging adjustment would be tough on arm, though I'd understand if nobody cared about my use case. From atler at pld-linux.org Thu Jul 28 14:17:19 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:17:19 +0200 Subject: Unable to install some old? packages Message-ID: <20220728121719.zebdwckcgqy4p23n@pine.grzadka> # rpm --initdb --root=/pld # rpm --import --root=/pld PLD-3.0-Th-GPG-key.asc # poldek --root=/pld -uv filesystem ... Processing dependencies... filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64 marks FHS-3.0-7.x86_64 (cap FHS >= 3.0) There are 2 packages to install (1 marked by dependencies): A FHS-3.0-7.x86_64 filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64 Need to get 83.4KB of archives (83.4KB to download). [1/2] th::FHS-3.0-7.x86_64.rpm [50.4K (50.4K/s)] [2/2] th::filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64.rpm [33.0K (33.0K/s)] FHS-3.0-7.x86_64.rpm: digests OK filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64.rpm: digests OK Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root /home/users/jan/pld --define _check_dirname_deps 0... Verifying... ################################# [100%] Preparing... ################################# [100%] package filesystem-4.1-15.x86_64 does not verify: no digest Any idea what else is needed? Without importing gpg key it works fine, but why it doesn't with gpg key?