From zawadaa at gmail.com Tue Sep 13 16:15:06 2022 From: zawadaa at gmail.com (Andrzej Zawadzki) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:15:06 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> Message-ID: <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> On 1.07.2022 19:22, Peri Noid wrote: Dnia piatek, 1 lipca 2022 14:31:04 CEST Andrzej Zawadzki pisze: OK Qt5 was to fresh. I found in logs: *plasmashell[2012]: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (5.15.4) with this library (5.15.5)* Hmm, rebuild is needed? I did a full downgrade of Qt5 to 5.15.4 and it works - so yes, the problem is somewhere there. We're still missing some of Qt5 packets in thre 5.15.5 version to be able to upgrade everything to this version. At least now. Hi! Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with NetworkManager. Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all kde5 packages will help. -- Andrzej Zawadzki From krzysztof at mrozowicz.eu Wed Sep 14 01:40:26 2022 From: krzysztof at mrozowicz.eu (Krzysztof Mrozowicz) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:40:26 +0100 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20220914004026.26ea9412@oko> Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 Andrzej Zawadzki napisa?(a): > Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with > NetworkManager. > > Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all kde5 > packages will help. I sent all ka5 and kp5 packages to rebuild. They should be done over the night. Kf5 were done earlier today due to their update. -- Krzysiek From zawadaa at gmail.com Wed Sep 14 10:29:58 2022 From: zawadaa at gmail.com (Andrzej Zawadzki) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:29:58 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <20220914004026.26ea9412@oko> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> <20220914004026.26ea9412@oko> Message-ID: <774d55a0-ed4a-354a-46e6-efaf7aa1f68e@gmail.com> On 14.09.2022 01:40, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 Andrzej Zawadzki [1] napisal/(a): Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with NetworkManager. Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all kde5 packages will help. I sent all ka5 and kp5 packages to rebuild. They should be done over the night. Kf5 were done earlier today due to their update. Works now. But... should KDE be strictly dependent on the Qt version? Second time when Qt update broke my KDE environment. -- Andrzej Zawadzki References 1. mailto:zawadaa at gmail.com From krzysztof at mrozowicz.eu Wed Sep 14 13:10:08 2022 From: krzysztof at mrozowicz.eu (Krzysztof Mrozowicz) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:10:08 +0100 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <774d55a0-ed4a-354a-46e6-efaf7aa1f68e@gmail.com> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> <20220914004026.26ea9412@oko> <774d55a0-ed4a-354a-46e6-efaf7aa1f68e@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20220914121008.68c25bd4@oko> Dnia 2022-09-14, o godz. 10:29:58 Andrzej Zawadzki napisa?(a): > Works now. > > But... should KDE be strictly dependent on the Qt version? > > Second time when Qt update broke my KDE environment. As a non-programmer, I'm guessing that KDE expects that all its components will be build with the same QT version. The problem is that the particular components, ka5, kf5, kp5 appear for upgrades at different times, so if between upgrading let's say kf5 packages and kp5 packages the QT version gets changed, then the problem occurs. I guess every QT5 upgrade should trigger rebuilding of all ka5, kf5 and kp5 packages... -- Krzysiek From atler at pld-linux.org Wed Sep 14 14:25:13 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:25:13 +0200 Subject: KDE - all form test In-Reply-To: <774d55a0-ed4a-354a-46e6-efaf7aa1f68e@gmail.com> References: <4710ab32-a134-5fab-6cb5-8ec614e80f35@gmail.com> <93bfc5c8-f164-41da-8336-cbfc1d6a3dd2@email.android.com> <12010522.O9o76ZdvQC@laptok> <850b4114-9e07-bbea-531b-6f0a034066ec@gmail.com> <20220914004026.26ea9412@oko> <774d55a0-ed4a-354a-46e6-efaf7aa1f68e@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20220914122513.rurvvsjdopby5bqk@pine.grzadka> On 14.09.2022 10:29, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > On 14.09.2022 01:40, Krzysztof Mrozowicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > > Dnia 2022-09-13, o godz. 16:15:06 > Andrzej Zawadzki [1] napisal/(a): > > > Qt 5.15.6 - similar problem. For example kwallet doesn't work with > NetworkManager. > > Downgrade help, so looks like after Qt upgrade rebuild off all kde5 > packages will help. > > I sent all ka5 and kp5 packages to rebuild. They should be done over > the night. Kf5 were done earlier today due to their update. > > > Works now. > > But... should KDE be strictly dependent on the Qt version? > > Second time when Qt update broke my KDE environment. Ideally KDE should not have strict Qt version dependency as I suppose Qt should not be breaking compatibility between patch releases. That's the theory though. For example keepassxc was broken after upgrade as well due to some missing symbol related to qt concurrent. Either Qt broke ABI compatibility or keepassxc misused Qt API, whichever is more likely. I didn't bother to investigate deeper. Unless someone investigates what and why is broken in KDE and rebuilds just affected packages, I suppose the best way forward is indeed rebuild everything each time Qt is upgraded. From elan.ruusamae at gmail.com Tue Sep 20 00:07:57 2022 From: elan.ruusamae at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Elan_Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 01:07:57 +0300 Subject: %_usrlibrpm macro gone Message-ID: <9CCF7C6A-CAD1-41D2-B8E9-62B45CBBFFE2@gmail.com> rpm-4.17.1.1-1.x86_64 dokuwiki* packages don?t build due that: ``` + %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh /home/users/glen/tmp/dokuwiki-20180422c-x86_64-root-glen dokuwiki.lang /home/users/glen/tmp/rpm-tmp.oRtxaL[82]: %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh: inaccessible or not found ``` What?s the replacement? Should it be restored instead? From ngompa13 at gmail.com Tue Sep 20 00:13:00 2022 From: ngompa13 at gmail.com (Neal Gompa) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:13:00 -0400 Subject: %_usrlibrpm macro gone In-Reply-To: <9CCF7C6A-CAD1-41D2-B8E9-62B45CBBFFE2@gmail.com> References: <9CCF7C6A-CAD1-41D2-B8E9-62B45CBBFFE2@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:08 PM Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > > rpm-4.17.1.1-1.x86_64 > > dokuwiki* packages don?t build due that: > > ``` > > + %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh /home/users/glen/tmp/dokuwiki-20180422c-x86_64-root-glen dokuwiki.lang > /home/users/glen/tmp/rpm-tmp.oRtxaL[82]: %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh: inaccessible or not found > ``` > > What?s the replacement? Should it be restored instead? > %_rpmconfigdir is the official macro that points to /usr/lib/rpm. -- ?????????/ Always, there's only one truth! From atler at pld-linux.org Sat Sep 24 15:08:34 2022 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:08:34 +0200 Subject: freshness report not fresh Message-ID: <20220924130834.4dxk7muyqiaawksc@pine> For some time now freshness report at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness does not seem to be updated. Can someone have a look? From baggins at pld-linux.org Tue Sep 27 13:41:50 2022 From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:41:50 +0200 Subject: freshness report not fresh In-Reply-To: <20220924130834.4dxk7muyqiaawksc@pine> References: <20220924130834.4dxk7muyqiaawksc@pine> Message-ID: On Sat, 24 Sep 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > For some time now freshness report at > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness does not seem to be > updated. Can someone have a look? Fixed. Leftover lock in SPECS repo :/ -- Jan R?korajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/