From atler at pld-linux.org Fri Mar 24 12:42:46 2023 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 12:42:46 +0100 Subject: GitHub key needs an update Message-ID: With each push following is logged from github mirror sync: remote: Pushing to github mirror... remote: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ remote: @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ remote: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ remote: IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! remote: Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! remote: It is also possible that a host key has just been changed. remote: The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is remote: SHA256:uNiVztksCsDhcc0u9e8BujQXVUpKZIDTMczCvj3tD2s. remote: Please contact your system administrator. remote: Add correct host key in /home/services/git/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. remote: Offending RSA key in /home/services/git/.ssh/known_hosts:1 remote: Host key for github.com has changed and you have requested strict checking. remote: Host key verification failed. remote: fatal: Could not read from remote repository. remote: remote: Please make sure you have the correct access rights remote: and the repository exists. remote: ...done That's expected and GitHub host key needs an update, see: https://github.blog/2023-03-23-we-updated-our-rsa-ssh-host-key/ From arekm at maven.pl Fri Mar 24 13:19:17 2023 From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=c5=9bkiewicz?=) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:19:17 +0100 Subject: GitHub key needs an update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0b85b771-0e69-7c60-14d5-102c41a168f0@maven.pl> On 24.03.2023 12:42, Jan Palus wrote: > That's expected and GitHub host key needs an update, see: > https://github.blog/2023-03-23-we-updated-our-rsa-ssh-host-key/ Updated. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) From qboosh at pld-linux.org Sat Mar 25 20:26:38 2023 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:26:38 +0100 Subject: Qt packaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230325192638.GA26319@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:03:54AM +0200, Jan R?korajski wrote: > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? Beside build time and space requirements, I see one more reason now: rebuilding after dependent package soname change is more painful. Current case: jasper 3.x. Split case: just qt5-qtimageformats.spec to rebuild Monolithic case: whole qt6.spec to rebuild -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/