From atler at pld-linux.org  Fri Feb  2 00:14:57 2024
From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 00:14:57 +0100
Subject: New packages not available on ftp
Message-ID: <qrvmc3xijinxliwdrgkxfjt26beqqxonbqvzgkhc44w5kat45y@c633mkaafpbg>

None of packages built today on builders is available on ftp.
Can someone check?


From arekm at maven.pl  Fri Feb  2 08:50:09 2024
From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 08:50:09 +0100
Subject: New packages not available on ftp
In-Reply-To: <qrvmc3xijinxliwdrgkxfjt26beqqxonbqvzgkhc44w5kat45y@c633mkaafpbg>
References: <qrvmc3xijinxliwdrgkxfjt26beqqxonbqvzgkhc44w5kat45y@c633mkaafpbg>
Message-ID: <f97c5aaf-c0f8-4b4b-917d-3de633b23ec4@maven.pl>

On 02/02/2024 00:14, Jan Palus wrote:
> None of packages built today on builders is available on ftp.
> Can someone check?

Something bad happened on ep09 machine (which is main ftp machine; 
doesn't let ssh in; disconnects).

No idea who else beside RMF has access to console on this VM.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )



From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Sat Feb  3 20:56:25 2024
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 20:56:25 +0100
Subject: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
In-Reply-To: <3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
References: <acb15ddb10d7b3397af9d03155504f1d773ebfdd_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
 <3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20240203195625.GA6830@mail>

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486
> Author: Witold Filipczyk <witekfl at poczta.onet.pl>
> Date:   Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100
> 
>     - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
> 
>  kf5-attica.spec | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Shouldn't these (kf5-* 5.249.0) be kf6-*.spec now?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/


From witekfl at poczta.onet.pl  Sun Feb  4 15:04:21 2024
From: witekfl at poczta.onet.pl (Witold Filipczyk)
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:04:21 +0100
Subject: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
In-Reply-To: <20240203195625.GA6830@mail>
References: <acb15ddb10d7b3397af9d03155504f1d773ebfdd_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
 <3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
 <20240203195625.GA6830@mail>
Message-ID: <Zb-ZZf0EQ9Oqcw3H@debian.Home>

Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisa?(a):
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486
> > Author: Witold Filipczyk <witekfl at poczta.onet.pl>
> > Date:   Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100
> > 
> >     - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
> > 
> >  kf5-attica.spec | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> Shouldn't these (kf5-* 5.249.0) be kf6-*.spec now?

OK. What to do with plasma (now kp5-*) and KDE Gear (now ka5-*) ?

> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-pl mailing list
> pld-devel-pl at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl


From atler at pld-linux.org  Mon Feb  5 02:02:27 2024
From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:02:27 +0100
Subject: TEST build ERRORS: test.spec
In-Reply-To: <pld-builder.1707094249.270522.15563@nereid>
References: <67e5e984-4272-4b60-ba4e-c248a56398fe@pld.src.builder>
 <pld-builder.1707094249.270522.15563@nereid>
Message-ID: <ttm76r6whr4rm3ir5a4tlpwdjg3m3phdbc6znlyg5q73cxl3ai@jtnugpxvco2q>

On 05.02.2024 00:50, PLD th-i686 builder wrote:
> test.spec (cryptsetup-debug): FAILED
...
> + test cafa743b687f1581b71a20ebfc068f9fe12653e945c417311b861c9217e66adf '=' 06e2f159d6d541169da75222a7f0bedd0fc700502d63809f577b48f41eace335

Something concerning is going on i686/x32 builders. All started with
cryptsetup tests failing there without any clear root cause. Code
involved in failing test is pretty straightforward and has no issues as
far as I can tell. Managed to narrow it down to:

- happens only on PLD builders
- happens only on 32-bit archs
- happens only when direct io (O_DIRECT) is involved

The concerning part is that writing with O_DIRECT produces non-sense
result. Parts of write might be missing or they might be scattered in
different places even though they should be contiguous.

Simple reproducer is currently present in test package on
cryptsetup-debug branch.

I've tried to replicate the env (i686 VM, XFS) but without success. Not
sure if it's block device driver? XFS? or something else? Can't do much
more without ability to reproduce. Any ideas are welcome.


From arekm at maven.pl  Mon Feb  5 09:48:40 2024
From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:48:40 +0100
Subject: TEST build ERRORS: test.spec
In-Reply-To: <ttm76r6whr4rm3ir5a4tlpwdjg3m3phdbc6znlyg5q73cxl3ai@jtnugpxvco2q>
References: <67e5e984-4272-4b60-ba4e-c248a56398fe@pld.src.builder>
 <pld-builder.1707094249.270522.15563@nereid>
 <ttm76r6whr4rm3ir5a4tlpwdjg3m3phdbc6znlyg5q73cxl3ai@jtnugpxvco2q>
Message-ID: <ec371f48-75d7-4043-b0ce-e161e3b97e21@maven.pl>

On 05/02/2024 02:02, Jan Palus wrote:

> I've tried to replicate the env (i686 VM, XFS) but without success. Not
> sure if it's block device driver? XFS? or something else? Can't do much
> more without ability to reproduce. Any ideas are welcome.

All builders run on the same physical machine as VMs under proxmox 8.1:
pve-manager/8.1.4/ec5affc9e41f1d79 (running kernel: 6.5.11-8-pve)

Each builder uses two physical SSD disks (crucial: x32 - mx200, i686 - 
mx300, x86_64 - mx500).

SSD are available to VMs as passthru. VMs have soft RAID1 setup inside, 
xfs fs on top of that. It's basically old hardware setup migrated from 3 
different physical machines into one with proxmox.

Providing disk directly to VM seems to be a key to reproduce the problem 
(as I was unable to reproduce it on the same machine when VM visible 
disk was backed by just qcow2 file).

Disks used default options (so no cache, no discard, no io thread, no 
skip replication, async io - io_uring). Virtio interface.

But I noticed that enabling discard on these hard disks (in 
proxmox->VM->Hardware->Hard disk) makes problem go away.

So enabled on all builders.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )



From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Tue Feb  6 21:47:45 2024
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 21:47:45 +0100
Subject: [packages/kf5-attica] - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
In-Reply-To: <Zb-ZZf0EQ9Oqcw3H@debian.Home>
References: <acb15ddb10d7b3397af9d03155504f1d773ebfdd_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
 <3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org>
 <20240203195625.GA6830@mail> <Zb-ZZf0EQ9Oqcw3H@debian.Home>
Message-ID: <20240206204745.GA23834@mail>

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 03:04:21PM +0100, Witold Filipczyk via pld-devel-en wrote:
> Dnia Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisa?(a):
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:39:39PM +0100, witekfl wrote:
> > > commit 3b3013be1262989c7a7df78ffab6d797766b6486
> > > Author: Witold Filipczyk <witekfl at poczta.onet.pl>
> > > Date:   Sat Feb 3 20:24:04 2024 +0100
> > > 
> > >     - updated to 5.249.0; rel 0.1
> > > 
> > >  kf5-attica.spec | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Shouldn't these (kf5-* 5.249.0) be kf6-*.spec now?
> 
> OK. What to do with plasma (now kp5-*) and KDE Gear (now ka5-*) ?

No idea about starting prefix (should "kp" and "ka" be preserved or
changed), but AFAICS files/dirs are getting "6" suffix now, so IMO number
should be updated (or dropped, if KDE 6 is going to instantly replace
KDE 5).


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/