/etc/sgml

[Jakub Bogusz]

$ for f in /etc/sgml/* ; do echo -ne "$f:\t" ; rpm -qf $f ; done
/etc/sgml/catalog:      file /etc/sgml/catalog is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/dsssl-1.4.cat:        file /etc/sgml/dsssl-1.4.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/dsssl-stylesheets-1.76.cat:   file /etc/sgml/dsssl-stylesheets-1.76.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.0.cat: file /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.0.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.1.cat: file /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.1.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.1.cat: file /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.1.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook.cat:     file /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook.cat is not owned by any package
/etc/sgml/sgml.conf:    sgml-common-0.5-8

Czy one nie powinny do czegoś należeć?

Dalej:

$ cat /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.0.cat
CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/sgml-iso-entities-8879.1986/catalog
CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/docbook/sgml-dtd-3.0/catalog
CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets-1.65/catalog
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook.cat jest symlinkiem do sgml-docbook-3.0.cat.

skąd się wzięło to podkreślone? Teraz mam docbook-style-dsssl-1.76,
więc katalog z 1.65 już dawno nie istnieje - co powoduje komunikaty
jade przy generowaniu dokumentacji do np. wine.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl/~qboosh/