SOURCES: signal.c-2.4.26.patch (NEW) - [SECURITY] http://linuxrevi...
Jakub Bogusz
qboosh w pld-linux.org
Wto, 15 Cze 2004, 11:32:25 CEST
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:22:48AM +0000, paszczus wrote:
> diff -u /dev/null SOURCES/signal.c-2.4.26.patch:1.1
> --- /dev/null Tue Jun 15 06:22:48 2004
> +++ SOURCES/signal.c-2.4.26.patch Tue Jun 15 06:22:42 2004
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +--- linux-2.4.26/kernel/signal.c 2004-02-18 14:36:32.000000000 +0100
> ++++ linux-2.4.26-x/kernel/signal.c 2004-06-13 12:21:12.000000000 +0200
> +@@ -568,8 +568,14 @@
> + can get more detailed information about the cause of
> + the signal. */
> + if (sig < SIGRTMIN && sigismember(&t->pending.signal, sig))
> +- goto out;
> +-
> ++ {
> ++ if (sig==8)
> ++ {
> ++ printk("Attempt to exploit known bug, process=%s pid=%d uid=%d\n", t->comm, t->pid, t->uid);
> ++ do_exit(0);
> ++ }
> ++ goto out;
> ++ }
> + ret = deliver_signal(sig, info, t);
> + out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sigmask_lock, flags);
Co to, skąd to?
Bo właściwa poprawka (pod URL-em z komentarza) wygląda inaczej.
--
Jakub Bogusz http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/
Więcej informacji o liście dyskusyjnej pld-devel-pl