packages: ncurses/ncurses.spec - make it build on Titanium, try

[Andrzej Krzysztofowicz]

=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?= wrote:
> 2010/2/2 Elan Ruusamäe <glen w pld-linux.org>:
> > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:04:46 shadzik wrote:
> >> Author: shadzik
[...]
> >> +%if "%{pld_release}" != "ti"
> >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.6
> >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.*.*
> >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.5
> >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.*.*
> >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.5
> >> +%else
> >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.5
> >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libncursesw.so.5
> >> +%endif
> >
> > this has exceeded sane amount of the nesting level of ifdefs, please move the
> > branch specific spec to a dedicated branch, both branches be nicer and more
> > easier to update. there isn't so much changes in a spec that such complexity
> > of following the conditions (to verify nothing got broken after a change)
> > pays off.
> >
> > same applies to openssl.spec
> 
> This is the way Hawk told me to deal with such problems - exactly not
> to have dozens of branches - therefore I'm dealing with them that way.
> Two or three more conditions doesn't make it less readable. Request
> rejected.

CDG ?

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz                  ankry w mif.pg.gda.pl