[packages/spdlog] add note about implications of cxx20 bcond

[atler]

On 02.11.2026 23:54, atler wrote:
> commit 0bee8bcc2cf48d27effeb15df5d845995f511524
> Author: Jan Palus <atler at pld-linux.org>
> Date:   Mon Nov 2 23:53:51 2026 +0100
> 
>     add note about implications of cxx20 bcond
> 
>  spdlog.spec | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> diff --git a/spdlog.spec b/spdlog.spec
> index 53f8787..3750e02 100644
> --- a/spdlog.spec
> +++ b/spdlog.spec
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  #
>  # Conditional build:
> -%bcond_without	cxx20	# C++ 20 std::format instead of libfmt
> +%bcond_without	cxx20	# C++ 20 std::format instead of libfmt (users of library must be built with C++20 too)

Does anyone have strong preference for keeping this bcond enabled? C++
standard matching dance between library X which enforces -std=c++17 in its
CXXFLAGS, library Y which requires C++20 but does not enforce it in any
way, all when compiling application Z unaware of any of this is becoming
tiring. spdlog built with libfmt is more lenient which makes me want to
do the switch.