Future of Ac... or even of PLD

[Paweł Gołaszewski]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > What is missing in rpm from AC to have UTF-specs?
> Nothing. I decided to not put it there because default encoding on Ac is 
> ISO and working with UTF specs on ISO system is PITA or requires 
> additional tweaks/scripting for which I simply don't have time.

Wrong choice.
Why? Because with every spec that should be ony taged you'll have to do 
conversion. Which isn't needed...

Every developer will have to prepare his console anyway - we shouldn't 
care about that. Maybe just write some small tutorial :)

> > In something what is called "stable" it shouldn't happen.
> Well. If Ac 2.1 will not appear, then the architecture changes I wrote 
> about were already made in Th. Final user upgrading from Ac to next 
> stable will have do deal with those changes anyway.

But he would have choice and he will do this in good for him moment.

-- 
pozdr.  Paweł Gołaszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.