PLD 2.1 again

[Marcin Król]

After reading this thread once again I want to summarize results in form
of short poll. Please, take a while and answer those few questions
below. Thanks.

M.

1. What codename would you give to PLD 2.1?
a) Tc - mix of Ac and Th
b) Sc - bceause it has atomic number 21
c) Ti - because its similiar to Th and Titanium is cool :)

2. Which gcc would you like to see in PLD 2.1?
a) 4.1.2
b) 4.2.0

3. Which glibc would you like to see in PLD 2.1?
a) 2.5
b) 2.6

4. Should PLD 2.1 has rpm from Th and why do you think so?

5. Which architectures should be dropped from official PLD 2.1?
(multiple choice allowed, dropped means "not officialy supported" not
"killed and rm -rf'ed", except i386)
a) i386
b) alpha
c) ppc
d) sparc

6. Should architecture amd64 be renamed to x8664 (like in Th)?

7. What packages would you like to see in PLD 2.1 (packages that are
either not available in Ac or are available but in old versions)?

8. The whole PLD 2.1 idea is:
a) idiotic! don't do it!
b) waste of time, but it is your time so go ahead if you want
c) cool! I'd love to see PLD 2.1!