From jajcus at jajcus.net  Wed Oct 10 15:33:59 2018
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:33:59 +0200
Subject: freeradius-server 3.0
Message-ID: <9f153166-62bf-dffc-3cf5-dc53afa748a0@jajcus.net>

Hi,

I have been updating our freeradius-server package to current version
(3.0.17), as a part of updating PLD to the new OpenSSL. I managed to
build it and it even seems to work, but I have no way of proper testing it.

Also, changes in configuration and available modules are quite
significant between 2.2 and 3.0. There is no way a radius server will
just continue to run after update and I see no realistic way to do it ?
even if some triggers could do it, then only for some basic/default
configuration no one uses in a real world.

Additionally, I have dropped two third-party patches, as I could not
find any up-to-date versions:
http://download.ag-projects.com/CDRTool/contrib/freeradius-brandinger/failed_calls_accounting.patch
http://eduroam.pl/Dokumentacja/cui-fr-2.2.0.patch

In short: manual configuration changes will be needed after upgrading
freeradius-server and some functionality we had in freeradius-server 2.2
might be missing now.

Any thoughts? Anybody ready to do proper testing for the new package? Or
am I doing this just for sport?

Jacek


From hawk at pld-linux.org  Wed Oct 10 19:53:50 2018
From: hawk at pld-linux.org (Marcin Krol)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:53:50 +0200
Subject: freeradius-server 3.0
In-Reply-To: <9f153166-62bf-dffc-3cf5-dc53afa748a0@jajcus.net>
References: <9f153166-62bf-dffc-3cf5-dc53afa748a0@jajcus.net>
Message-ID: <5BBE3CAE.9080105@pld-linux.org>

> Any thoughts? Anybody ready to do proper testing for the new package? Or
> am I doing this just for sport?

I'll try to test it however tests will be done on TLD, not PLD and I'll 
need some time to adjust/rebuild packages and port my 2.2 configs.

M.