[RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Wed Mar 29 00:57:48 CEST 2006
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 3:04 pm, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> On Monday 27 March 2006 21:48, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Either way, it's not sounding like something I can grab and build uClibc
> > systems with any time soon, the way I could use Mazur's headers to build
> > uClibc. I'll probably wind up using the gentoo headers when the 2.6.14
> > version ships.
>
> That's the trouble. While I have nothing against someone (as in -- not me
> :) doing all that abi separation, it's not something I can use straight
> away. Hell, I don't even get where in all of it I'd end up with something I
> could use (granted, I haven't looked into the thread too closely). Not to
> mention, that I suspect, that if there were enough people to do it, it
> would have gotten done two years ago.
>
> So unless anybody's got a better idea, I'll try releasing some initial
> version of that llh-ng thingie rather soonish and see how that'll work out.
> Anybody with me on that? :)
I'm highly interested in seeing the result. :)
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the llh-discuss
mailing list