packages: icedove/icedove.spec - i'm not sure, but shouldn't we skip provid...

[glen]

Author: glen                         Date: Wed Sep  1 06:46:48 2010 GMT
Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
- i'm not sure, but shouldn't we skip providing/requiring libxpcom_core.so as well?; rel 2

---- Files affected:
packages/icedove:
   icedove.spec (1.99 -> 1.100) 

---- Diffs:

================================================================
Index: packages/icedove/icedove.spec
diff -u packages/icedove/icedove.spec:1.99 packages/icedove/icedove.spec:1.100
--- packages/icedove/icedove.spec:1.99	Thu Aug 26 11:27:05 2010
+++ packages/icedove/icedove.spec	Wed Sep  1 08:46:43 2010
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 Summary(pl.UTF-8):	Icedove - klient poczty
 Name:		icedove
 Version:	3.1.2
-Release:	1
+Release:	2
 License:	MPL 1.1 or GPL v2+ or LGPL v2.1+
 Group:		X11/Applications/Networking
 Source0:	http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/%{version}/source/thunderbird-%{version}.source.tar.bz2
@@ -101,12 +101,12 @@
 %define		filterout_cpp		-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9]+
 
 # iceweasel/icedove/iceape provide their own versions
-%define		_noautoreqdep		libgfxpsshar.so libgkgfx.so libgtkxtbin.so libjsj.so libxpcom_compat.so libxpcom_core.so libxpistub.so
+%define		_noautoreqdep		libgfxpsshar.so libgkgfx.so libgtkxtbin.so libjsj.so libxpcom_compat.so libxpistub.so
 %define		_noautoprovfiles	%{_libdir}/%{name}/components
 # we don't want these to satisfy xulrunner-devel
-%define		_noautoprov		libgtkembedmoz.so libmozjs.so libxpcom.so libxul.so
+%define		_noautoprov		libgtkembedmoz.so libmozjs.so libxpcom.so libxul.so libxpcom_core.so
 # and as we don't provide them, don't require either
-%define		_noautoreq		libgtkembedmoz.so libmozjs.so libxpcom.so libxul.so
+%define		_noautoreq		libgtkembedmoz.so libmozjs.so libxpcom.so libxul.so libxpcom_core.so
 
 %define		topdir		%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}
 %define		objdir		%{topdir}/obj-%{_target_cpu}
@@ -516,6 +516,9 @@
 All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
 
 $Log$
+Revision 1.100  2010/09/01 06:46:43  glen
+- i'm not sure, but shouldn't we skip providing/requiring libxpcom_core.so as well?; rel 2
+
 Revision 1.99  2010/08/26 09:27:05  glen
 - works now; rel 1
 
================================================================

---- CVS-web:
    http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/icedove/icedove.spec?r1=1.99&r2=1.100&f=u