Kernel

[Tomasz Kłoczko]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Jacek Konieczny wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 02:57:30PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Blues wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Lukas Dobrek wrote:
> > > > May I add to the kernel.spec generating of the package from pure Linus
> > > > sources. I like the idea of kernel from rpm with initrd and so on but
> > > > sometimes the PLD kernel does't work. It would be the same phylosophy
> > > > but without all this patches.
> > > 
> > > I've got better idea (I think...)
> > > 
> > > Why not to add all of the patches to bcond?
> > > If it would be build without any options -> kernel with all of the patches
> > > --without patch  -> we have clean kernel.
> > 
> > And it will be correct solution. Indeed it will be also good known when
> > our kernel fails (in what kind hardware enviroment) because probaly it
> > can mean something must be fixed.
> > 
> This won't work! Because some patches depend on each-other. And I don't
> think we can change it when several patches modify the same fragment of
> source code.

OK but probaly it is possible add abilities for build kernel without all
patches using bcond.
BTW current our bcont. IMHO it is time to change all bcond macros to
with/without convention which is in cvs verion rpm. It will be good have
all compliant with rpm 4.0.3 before release final 4.0.3.

kloczek
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek at rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl*