pam_limits again...

[Jan Rekorajski]

[piątek, 02 luty 2001], Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a):

> On/Dnia Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:35:17PM +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote/napisał(a)
> > Then in limits.h should be:
> > #ifdef 2.2 || 2.0
> > #define NLIMITS 10
> > else
> > #define NLIMITS 11
> > #endif
> > 
> > Got it?
> so as I said now after pam recompilation we have non-working pam_limits
> on 2.4 kernels

Where exactly pam_limits will not work? It will have no idea about
LIMIT_NLOCKS, but all others will work on both 2.2 _and_ 2.4.

Janek
-- 
Jan Rękorajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio