RFC: Ruby Packaging style

Aredridel aredridel at nbtsc.org
Mon Feb 23 05:27:37 CET 2004

I've been packing up a number of Ruby packages of late, and I had a
style question:

If I have a ruby package, "active_record", version 0.5, that provides
the classes/module "ActiveRecord", what's a good package name for it?

	* active_record
  * ruby-active_record
  * ruby-ActiveRecord

I'm leaning toward the last, to be consistent with Perl. Comments?

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list