has in PEAR status

[Jakub Bogusz]

[moved this old thread to pld-devel-en, maybe here we could find some
 consensus... as "This class has in PEAR status: %{_status}" looks
 very ugly to me]

On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:45:19PM +0100, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:24:11PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > (1) "In PEAR this package has status: %{_status}."
> > (2) "In PEAR status of this package is: %{_status}."
> > (3) "This package status is %{_status} in PEAR."
> > (4) "Status of this package is %{_status} in PEAR."
> > 
> > Jeśli (1), to chyba lepiej brzmiałoby
> > (1a) "In PEAR this package has %{_status} status."
> > 
> > Albo może (1b) "In PEAR this package is in %{_status} state."
> > 
> > A może w ogóle zrezygnować z "In PEAR" i zostawić
> > (1c) "This package is in %{_status} state."?
> 
> "PEAR's status of this package is: %{_status}" ?

Which of the above versions of package status information
(i.e. the quoted strings) sounds/looks better? Any other proposals?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/