Addresses on alpha

[havner]

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 11:48:29PM +0100, havner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 11:46:28PM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > havner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 11:20:33PM +0100, havner wrote:
> > > > + /usr/bin/strip --remove-section=.note --remove-section=.comment
> > > > /tmp/Addresses-0.4.6-root-builder2/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/AddressManager.app/alpha/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu/AddressManager
> > > > /tmp/Addresses-0.4.6-root-builder2/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/AddressManager.app/AddressManager
> > > > /usr/bin/strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
> > > > /tmp/Addresses-0.4.6-root-builder2/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/AddressManager.app/AddressManager
> > > > 
> > > > [builder2 at alpha SPECS]$ file
> > > > /tmp/Addresses-0.4.6-root-builder2/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/AddressManager.app/AddressManager
> > > > /tmp/Addresses-0.4.6-root-builder2/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/AddressManager.app/AddressManager:
> > > > ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
> > > > 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
> > > > 
> > > > "Intel 80386"
> > > > 
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > 
> > > There is precompiled binary inside of this package, so why it's not x86
> > > only?
> > 
> > If it is without sources there, so how the package can be GPL ?
> 
> Moreover, it's build on old sonames of gnustep, so it's useles even on
> x86 now. Is it really required? Cause GNUmail requires it.

Is this binary really required, cause GNUmail requires Addresses
package.

-- 
Regards       Havner                          http://livecd.pld-linux.org
GG: 2846839                             jid,mail: havner(at)pld-linux.org
          "We live as we dream, alone"   - Joseph Conrad