List of packages that didn't hit Ac.

Adam Gołębiowski adamg at biomerieux.pl
Mon Nov 15 06:34:20 CET 2004


On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:26:32AM +0100, Michal Chruszcz wrote:
> It seems like on Monday 15 of November 2004 02:41, havner typed:
> > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:50:37PM +0100, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:43:11PM +0100, Michal Chruszcz wrote:
> > > > I've looked at some interesting (for me) packages and updated/fixed
> > > > them. At the moment STBR for skippy.spec, python-gd.spec,
> > > > bakefile.spec and imgSeek.spec.
> > >
> > > Sent.
> >
> > but imgSeek.spec and python-gd.spec failed an amd64.
> 
> May I know why?

Some paths issue. Unfortunately I didn't have enough time to fix it,
maybe you'll give it a try. Here are buildlogs:

imgSeek:
http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?idx=13&ok=0&id=dc4c9e6075980b1c2ec50fb900e8eea0

python-gd:
http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?idx=13&ok=0&id=fbd7ca9cfeb56094c6af096765f99da9

-- 
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
   PLD Linux developer   | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.




More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list