Broken indexes on ftp

Jakub Bogusz qboosh at pld-linux.org
Fri Nov 19 00:24:07 CET 2004


On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:52AM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Kr=F3l?= wrote:
> > Some of you probably has read about problems with AC installation using 
> > network bootdisk. I must say, I was surprised by those problems, as I 
> > haven't changed bootdisk images in the meantime. I think that poldek 
> > indexes on ftp are broken. Why?
> > 
> > 1. Instead of installing packages, poldek in installer just says "broken 
> > dependencies". And nothing more. After adding -vv its says:
> > 
> > warn: req 'kernel-smp = 2.4.27-1' needs an epoch (assuming same epoch as
> > kernel-smp-3:2.6.8-4)
> > 
> > and same thing for almost every package, but of course with different 
> > package names and versions.
> > 
> > 2. Regenerating indexes on ftp doesn't fixes the problem. But 
> > regenerating indexes on my private mirror(s) solves the problem and 
> > everything is working ok again. While regenerating indexes my system 
> > poldek says "BROKEN" about original indexes from ftp. My poldek version: 
> >   0.18.7-2, version in installer: same, version on ftp: 0.18.3-4
> > 
> > So... If regenerating indexes helps, then those from ftp are broken. 
> > Question is: what was changed and is causing this? Whatever it was, it 
> > must be reverted or fixed, or installation via network bootdisks will 
> > not work.
> 
> # rpm -q poldek
> poldek-0.18.7-2
> 
> I use poldek from Ac-main tree and have no problems with indexes from ftp.
> Maybe it is poldek.conf problem ?

Nope...
poldek --conf=/tmp/poldekrc --install-dist=... --pset=installer.pkgs
failed with "broken dependencies"
poldek --conf=/tmp/poldekrc --root=... -Uv something
seemed to not (well, failed later on missing /bin/rpm)

poldek --conf=/tmp/poldekrc -V
complained about missing dependencies for outdated dev-udev package
causing unsatisfied dependencies for many packages (dev-udev has been
recently removed from ftp, but it was still in yesterday's indexes).
Maybe it was the reason?
dev-udev is not present in new indexes, we could try to install Ac again
today.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/




More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list