gcc-common, binutils-common

[The Undefined]

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:09:09PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:03:49PM +0200, The Undefined wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:26:29PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > Such packages have more sense than just providing dirs.
> > > They can provide system-wide locales and docs (man+info) for all
> > > gcc or binutils targets.
> > > But it would require to keep their versions in sync, which is at
> > > least hard to do...
> > i think it's impossible...
> > there is no way to always have version gpc equal gcc.
> 
> Well, files I was writing about don't apply to gpc.
no?
ok.. right...
but.. in example crossavr-gcc use gcc 3.4, and system-wide gcc is 3.3
there is no conflict? ;)
upgrade system gcc in ac is impossible, and in crossavr it could be
independent... ;)

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
UNIX && Linux administrator, Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer             HomePage: http://aramin.net/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net    e-mail: undefine at pld-linux.org