SPECS: clamav.spec - merged epoch 0 from RA-branch

[havner]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> havner wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, havner wrote:
> > > > > Author: qboosh                       Date: Tue Oct 19 19:17:03 2004 GMT
> > > > > Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> > > > > ---- Log message:
> > > > > - merged epoch 0 from RA-branch
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---- Files affected:
> > > > > SPECS:
> > > > >    clamav.spec (1.133 -> 1.134) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---- Diffs:
> > > > > 
> > > > > ================================================================
> > > > > Index: SPECS/clamav.spec
> > > > > diff -u SPECS/clamav.spec:1.133 SPECS/clamav.spec:1.134
> > > > > --- SPECS/clamav.spec:1.133	Tue Oct 19 11:24:48 2004
> > > > > +++ SPECS/clamav.spec	Tue Oct 19 19:16:57 2004
> > > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > > >  Name:		clamav
> > > > >  Version:	0.80
> > > > >  Release:	4
> > > > > +Epoch:		0
> > > > AKAIK, epoch 0 is deafult one, so what is it for?
> > > 
> > > RA-branch, babe :) It isn't there :)
> > 
> > 1. It's HEAD, it's just taken from RA-branch
> > 2. even if it was on RA-branch so what? This list doesn't apply to RA?
> > 3. I don't care what branch is it ;-), i just technicaly asked why is it
> >    needed?
> 
> It is needed as effect of previous changes: dependencies contains epoch.
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

But epoch 0 is default. There is a question though. Does "default" means
that %{epoch} is set even if it's not given, or it only means that
resulting package has epoch 0? According to this change I assume that
second option is correct.

> And because one-liner fix was simpler than few-liner fix.

-- 
Regards    Havner                      {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developer && PLD 2.0 release manager         http://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author                             http://livecd.pld-linux.org
                   "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"