glibc-devel: at.h, rose.h

[Tomasz Pala]

checking netatalk/at.h usability... no
checking netatalk/at.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists.  ##
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------------ ##
checking for netatalk/at.h... yes

checking netrose/rose.h usability... no
checking netrose/rose.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists.  ##
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------------ ##
checking for netrose/rose.h... yes

They don't know what sa_family_t is. After adding:

#include <ax25.h>                                                                                  

to both everything seems correct. Shouldn't it be there by default?

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>
http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/