SPECS (AC-branch): glibc.spec - workaround to be able upgrade from...

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Monday 20 December 2004 11:28, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > looks like dead end, only way to solve it is dependancy of package
> > containing static binary.
>
> This is the reason the "base" packages (like glibc, FHS, setup, etc.) do
> not contain %pre/%post shell scripts.
> The only acceptable script may be a LUA script.
> Or just a static binary program call.
hey

anything against if this goes to AC-branch? (this includes question about 
compiling with diet)

http://glen.alkohol.ee/pld/glibc-ldpath-fix.patch

and waiting for proposals for better script name for /sbin/glibc-postinst

ps: what are the reasons postshell.c being in a patch and placed to elf/ 
directory?

-- 
glen