cvs vs svn reloaded

[Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki]

Dnia 08-10-2005, sob o godzinie 20:21 +0200, Paweł Sakowski napisał(a):
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:08 +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > I think it's possible to write a post-commit hook that would effectively
> > simulate a hardlink capability. [...]
> > 
> > Does it sound like something that will keep everybody happy?
> Reasoning by the volume of replies I assume the answer is "yes, that's
> what we've been looking for our entire lives." ;) So, there it is in the
> repo. Request For Comments.

+1 from me

> > Note: there might be a race condition on resyncking when there are two
> > simultaneous commits to both locations. I'd have to check if the hooks
> > are (or can be) run on a mutexed repository.
> No, but the good thing is that nothing can get silently overwritten or
> sth -- I get a nice commit conflict. A superuser resolving those
> manually should be enough.

Do we need superuser intervention in such cases?

-- 
Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest =?iso-8859-2?Q?cz=EA=B6=E6?= listu podpisana
	cyfrowo
Url : /mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20051008/d7f286cc/attachment-0002.bin