pam split

[Paweł Gołaszewski]

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Elan [iso-8859-1] Ruusamäe wrote:
> anybody against splitting pam to pam and pam-libs?
>
> # rpm -Uhv pam-0.80.1-1.amd64.rpm
> Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
>         file /etc/security/consoles from install of pam-0.80.1-1 conflicts with file from package pam-0.79.1-4
>         file /etc/security/limits.conf from install of pam-0.80.1-1 conflicts with file from package pam-0.79.1-4
> # rpm -q pam --qf '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n'
> pam-0:0.79.1-4.amd64
> pam-0:0.79.1-4.athlon
> 
> so i could have single pam package, with config, doc, data files, and 
> two pam-libs from different arches

Yes, should be ok.

There is a lot of such a things...

-- 
pozdr.  Paweł Gołaszewski jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby 
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.