cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Michal Moskal]

On 9/6/05, Jan Rekorajski <baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > > let's start new war...
> > > >
> > > > what about moving repo to svn?
> > >
> > > Any reasons? SVN sucks a big one.
> >
> > svn diff without performing connection to remote server.
> 
> At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.

Why would anyone store all branches and tags locally?

Tagging can be done by svn cp http://somewhere/trunk
http://somewhere/tags/some-tag and moving to a new branch can be done
with svn switch http://somewhere/branches/some-branch. The results are
much like with cvs.

-- 
   Michal Moskal,
   http://nemerle.org/~malekith/