cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz]

On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> > >
> > > [baggins at sith rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS
> > > 959M    SOURCES
> > > 63M     SPECS
> >
> > Obviously svn makes no sense with such file organization (in two
> > directories). To allow reasonable branching, each package would have to
> > have a directory of its own. Which is a good idea anyway, but probably
> > it's not worth changing now.
>
> How would I make "cvs up SPECS" (without getting any SOURCES) then?
Not so easy as in cvs.

for pkg in `svn ls http://.../packages/`; do
	do whatever you need
done

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz                    PLD/Linux Team
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/  http://ftp.pld-linux.org/