SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

[Patryk Zawadzki]

Dnia 17-05-2006, śro o godzinie 00:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a):
> > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > > > BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already.
> > > > 
> > > > Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge?
> > > 
> > > mozilla.spec
> > > mozilla-firefox.spec
> > > mozilla-thunderbird.spec
> > 
> > > so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho
> > 
> > I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for
> > thunderbird.
> 
> Sources are called just firefox and thunderbird, but full application
> names are "Mozilla Firefox" and "Mozilla Thunderbird".
> And the latter is a companion to the first, so it's rational to keep
> them grouped.

Agreed but I still prefer Evolution to Thunderbird ;)

BTW: other distros use firefox and thunderbird as package names.

> > We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we
> > name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should
> > be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when
> > seamonkey is not officially supported).
> And the last remark was the reason I committed seamonkey.spec, not
> mozilla-seamonkey.spec.

Ok then.

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux