SPECS: jakarta-log4j.spec - version 1.2.13 - commented out BR/R: j...
radek42 at gmail.com
Sun May 21 13:30:53 CEST 2006
Jan Rekorajski <baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl> [21-05-2006 13:04]:
> On Sun, 21 May 2006, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:48:27PM +0200, radek wrote:
>>> Author: radek Date: Sun May 21 10:48:27 2006 GMT
>>> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
>>> ---- Log message:
>>> - version 1.2.13
>>> - commented out BR/R: javamail, jms, jmx: builds without these
>>> (I'm not sure if it's a proper change, though)
>> I think it is not -- that will probably result in very limited log4j
>> package. That should be built with all the requirements and CLASSPATH
>> prepared adequately. The best is to look into jpackage how they did
> Exactly, without those R we will get incomplete package.
I didn't know about java-gnu-mail... so, javamail is not an issue.
Will it be incomplete as "useless" or as "with limited functionality"?
>> javamail is provided via our gnu-java-mail. I am not sure what provides
>> jms and jmx (it may be sun-java or something elese).
These two are not distributable, so if we restore BR, we won't be able
to distribute log4j...
Radosław Zieliński <radek at pld-linux.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20060521/9c1364b9/attachment.sig
More information about the pld-devel-en