[th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad
Jakub Bogusz
qboosh at pld-linux.org
Sun Nov 26 23:35:45 CET 2006
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:26:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:57, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote:
> > > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100
> > > > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100
> > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > > > do
> > > > case "$dep" in
> > > > /*.la)
> > > > + $dep = `readlink -f $dep`
> > > > echo "libtool($dep)"
> > > > ;;
> > > > esac
> > >
> > > That won't work.
> >
> > Will. Ie. some package R: libtool(/usr/lib/libdb.la), with this patch
> > will be converted to R: libtool(/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la), which is
> > provided by db4.5-devel
>
> What happen if there will be new db4.6? You will need to rebuild things again
> to get libtool(libdb4.6.la) which wouldn't be required if the dep be
> libtoo(libdb.la).
It would be anyway, because of libdb* soname change.
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list