vim languages

[Mariusz Mazur]

Dnia wtorek, 7 sierpnia 2007, Pawel Golaszewski napisał:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > > any comments?
> >
> > The basic packages should be 'low reqs' and 'high reqs' (which
> > translates to -- no langs and all langs). Anything in between should be
> > left to ppl directly interested.
>
> "All-or-nothing" isn't the best choice...
> I think that there should be 3 possibilities:
> - vim like in current packages we know. It would be nice to keep it.
> - vim-tiny (or minimal) - for monks
> - vim-full - for those who like all the bells and whistles

What's the difference between current vim and vim-full?


-- 
Oceniaj innych po zamiarach, a siebie po wynikach.
                                                                 Guy Kawasaki
Wykształcenie jest rzeczą godną podziwu, acz dobrze czasem
pamiętać, że niczego, co warto wiedzieć, nie da się kogoś nauczyć.
                                                                  Oscar Wilde