[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten błąd?]

[Adam Golebiowski]

On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
> >>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
> >>> was released. and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would
> >>> mean changing the distro, i.e dropping some architectures and 2.4
> >>> kernel compatability.
> >>
> >> What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel??
> >> Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help
> >> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features?
> >> upgrade kernel for desktops in AC - useless
> >
> > explain?
>
> If I have new machine I wont install AC. Give me one reason to do so and
> not to install Ti(or Th)

Against Th - I still believe it's not as stable as it should be, though I am 
using Th (th+th-test) on one machine only, so I can't really compare it to th 
(without th-test). 

Against Ti - no pros nor cons, don't know it. 

> If I have old machine with AC - it is working what's the point of
> upgrading kernel?

Because new shiny raid controller just arrived. Or you had motherboard failure 
and replaced it with one having a RTL8111/8168B based NIC. Or ...

> As I said before, why not upgrading RA packages for security/features
> reason - I have 2 RA servers well working and dont want to migrate them.

So do I, but I also have Ac servers that I care about. And I have Ac on my 
laptop, where I'd like to play a bit with kernel-desktop.

-- 
http://www.agmk.net/ - hosting, strony www, opieka informatyczna