libfoo-libs

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:00:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 22:50:48 Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > > however, the difference is due the .info file is generated from .texi.
> > > >
> > > > libidn-0.6.10/doc/libidn.texi:This manual is last updated
> > > > @value{UPDATED} for version
> > >
> > > what to do here. for timestamp it would be ok to remove the
> > > @value{UPDATED} from .texi, as it's not appropriate anyway (it's time doc
> > > was converted not the time it was last updated)
> > >
> > > but the "Tag Table:" part, it's probably not possible.
> >
> > I think there is no need to worry, there are only differences by 1 or 2,
> > corresponding to date string length differences...
> 
> so, to conclude:
> 
> a) remove @value{UPDATED} from .texi?
> 
> or
> 
> b) build all arch packages on same date? :)

The latter should be relatively easy using our builder architecture,
just avoid sending request just before midnight ;)

Or you can replace (using patch or sed) @value{UPDATED} by some
arbitrary date.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/