xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
wrobell at pld-linux.org
Sat Dec 20 15:47:15 CET 2008
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so
> > > simple things.
> > it is messy as you need to look at distro line i 3 ways
> > - trunk (no changes)
> > - ac branch
> > - and now ac bcond
> No, there should be always AC branch/tag for last version that s prepared
> for AC.
> It's easier to move tag/branch than merge changes.
i really don't mind until specs get messy. your choice guys.
so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like "ra", "ac",
and "ti". there shall be no "th" bconds as it is trunk forever.
is that ok for everyone?
wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>
More information about the pld-devel-en