xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz]

On Saturday 20 of December 2008, wrobell wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > >
> > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so
> > > > simple things.
> > >
> > > it is messy as you need to look at distro line i 3 ways
> > > - trunk (no changes)
> > > - ac branch
> > > - and now ac bcond
> >
> > No, there should be always AC branch/tag for last version that s prepared
> > for AC.
> > It's easier to move tag/branch than merge changes.
>
> i really don't mind until specs get messy. your choice guys.
>
> so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like "ra", "ac",
> and "ti". there shall be no "th" bconds as it is trunk forever.

Prepare for "arekm" and "companyiworkfor" conditions, too! (joke... for now)

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/