xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

[wrobell]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
> > > > bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > >
> > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
> > > simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple
> > > things.
> >
> > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is going to
> > clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line?
> 
> you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it...

to be honest, that's too optymistic statement. but... will you?

best regards,

    wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>