xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
wrobell at pld-linux.org
Tue Dec 23 16:19:36 CET 2008
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:34:52PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > > > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so
> > > > > simple things.
> > > >
> > > > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is
> > > > going to clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line?
> > >
> > > you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it...
> > to be honest, that's too optymistic statement. but... will you?
> i'l complete the sentence: "and ask whoever added it, whether you can remove
> i don't say how things should be, i just say how they are...
well... me too :)
my point is that it is really easy to remove a branch or a tag from CVS,
but it is a lot of work to remove the bconds from multiple specs.
wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>
More information about the pld-devel-en