SPECS: wine.spec - updated to 1.1.0

Adam Gołębiowski adamg at biomerieux.pl
Sat Jun 28 21:43:45 CEST 2008


On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 09:33:36PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
> > And bump epoch? Oh boy...
> 
> No need to. 1.1.0 wasn't built for Titanium yet.

We'd have to if arekm rejected wine-1.1.0 (it was sent to builders).
Luckily, it's not needed.

> > You could have 1.0.0
> > in Ti, and once 1.1.x becomes stable, you would just bump version, no
> > epoch bymp needed.
> 
> I didn't decided yet if 1.1.0 should go to Titanium or not. However I 
> don't like forcing devel versions on HEAD just because "they're available".

Rejecting devel versions just because they are devel versions is no
good either - it's like... should we drop mutt-1.5 from HEAD? Or
kde*branch 3.5.x diffs?

As I said - it's just a matter of common sense. 

-- 
 http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
   PLD Linux developer    | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list