On Thursday 23 April 2009 14:18:12 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> And why did you changed "$@" to ${1:+"$@"}? "$@" is expanded to
> nothing (instead of empty string) when no parameters where given (it is
> not "$*").
i always tought "$@" expands to list with one empty string, thx for tearing 
down this false bit from me :)
-- 
glen