jakarta-commons-*.spec naming

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Thursday 05 February 2009 13:11:23 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
> > What about packages like beanshell? It may be used as java libraries and
> > as stand-alone application. Should we rename it to java-...?
>
> Maybe a beanshell.spec building: beanshell and java-beanshell? First
> would contain a startup script in %{_bindir} and anything else used only
> in standalone mode, and the second would contain all the library stuff.

agree with packages naming, but what about spec?

indeed you can use -n beanshell in java-beanshell.spec too, so doesnt' really 
matter, but benefit is that you could locate better all .spec files related 
to Java.

-- 
glen