proftpd compromised sources

Caleb Maclennan caleb at
Thu Dec 2 14:11:55 CET 2010

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:02, Marcin Rybak <marcin.rybak at> wrote:
> I have no idea if it's important to PLD, but if we take sources from oficial
> this should be taken into account:

PLD's spec file was last updated on the 25th before the above
mentioned compromise took place and the md5 checksum we have for our
sources is the correct validated one.

Thanks for the heads up.


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list