*.py packaging, again

Jeff Johnson n3npq at mac.com
Thu Jul 14 13:11:41 CEST 2011

On Jul 14, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:

> Ok, you may be right. But what than? We don't even have an idea how
> should the proper rpm solution work and no volunteers to design and code
> it. At the same time Python 3.2 is waiting for being included in PLD,

Um, that isn't true: I did just ask for a statement of
what is desired with __pycache__ handling for the purpose
of attempting to design/code a solution in RPM.

73 de Jeff

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list