uClibc 0.9.32

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 17 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > Is it OK to merge 0.9.32 on HEAD?
> > The simple static cases (busybox functions) which were reported to fail
> > with 0.9.31 seem to work now (tested on i686).
> 
> This one fails:
> 
> [arekm at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ cat a1.c
> int
> main ()
> {
> 
>           ;
>             return 0;
> }
> 
> [arekm at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ i686-uclibc-gcc -o conftest -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing 
> -fwrapv -march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -gdwarf-4 -g2  -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -Wl,--
> as-needed -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,combreloc a1.c
> [arekm at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ ./conftest
> zsh: segmentation fault  ./conftest

Uhm :/
More complex programs (like busybox) used to work for me at the time of
testing.
I don't think dwarf-4 is the reason.

Does switching ld to bfd version help?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/