Git migration: next step

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:00:34AM +0100, Przemo Firszt wrote:
> 
> Dnia 3 Kwietnia 2012, 6:34 pm, Wt, Kacper Kornet napisał(a):
> >
> > I think all necessary pieces of code for git migration are ready. The
> > test setup on carme has been working for some time. So if you want to
> > check how your favourite package would like after migration please see:
> >
> > git://carme.pld-linux.org/packages/<pkg>
> >
> > Also some documentation has been written:
> >
> > http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/pld-gitolite
> > http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/howto-git
> 
> Can we agree a naming convention? Something like:
> "package-name: description" (it's similar to kernel patches)
> i.e. "xorg-driver-input-wacom: up to 14.0.0" or
> "xorg-driver-input-wacom: fix invalid BuildReq"?

I don't find "package-name: " prefix useful, as there (AFAIK) will be
one package per repository.

> Are we going to use "git tag" to mark a new version of the software or
> version of the spec or both?

NVR tags should be done automatically like in CVS.

> Is Signed-off-by required in patches?

No sense IMO if committer is the author.

> [..]
> >
> > 6. Setup mailing list for git commits
> I think there is no need for a separate list.

Agreed, single [cvs-]commit list should suffice.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/