Jakub Bogusz qboosh at
Thu Feb 14 16:33:46 CET 2013

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:17:20PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 14.02.2013 16:54, Marcin Banasiak wrote:
> >2013/2/14 Elan Ruusamäe:
> >>how gtkspell 3.x should be packaged?
> >I think that we should upgrade gtkspell.spec to 3.x and create
> >gtkspell2.spec for 2.x. Sooner or later packages that depend on 2.x
> >will be ported to the new API and then we can simply remove gtkspell2.
> >
> seems upstream tarball name is gtkspell3, library names gtkspell3-3.pc 
> etc, seems better to clone current to gtkspell3 ...
> so, either way is fine to me, somebody just has to say which way :)

In such case (gtkspell3 everywhere) I'd use gtkspell3.spec.

Jakub Bogusz

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list