[packages/CUnit] - updated to 2.1 - updated curses, libs, FHS patches - separated -libs, -static (base is the developme
jajcus at jajcus.net
Wed Oct 16 17:46:27 CEST 2013
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:15:33 +0300 Elan Ruusamäe <glen at pld-linux.org>
> On 16.10.2013 17:25, qboosh wrote:
> > diff --git a/CUnit.spec b/CUnit.spec
> > index bfdfaae..abf907c 100644
> > --- a/CUnit.spec
> > +++ b/CUnit.spec
> > @@ -1,19 +1,26 @@
> > +# NOTE: due to its nature, base package is development tool, so
> > there is no separate -devel +#
> i would prefer to omit base package and still create -devel.
> this way i can easily cleanup machine from development stuff: poldek
> -e `rpm -qa '*-devel'`
So, should we rename 'gcc' to 'gcc-devel' and 'make' to 'make-devel'?
Unless the package contains _only_ header files and libraries (no
binaries) keeping -devel only does not make sense to me.
More information about the pld-devel-en