jajcus at jajcus.net
Mon Jul 27 08:43:32 CEST 2015
On 2015-07-27 08:35, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>> And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly
>> instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its
>> own, though probably without x32 support.
> how would pld name the package?
> a) openjdk.spec?
> b) openjdk8.spec?
That works well in any intermediate stages and worked well for sun-java*
> in Fedora it's like this:
> [~/fc] ➔ cat java-1.7.0-icedtea/dead.package; echo
> java-1.7.0-icedtea was replaced by java-1.6.0-openjdk.
That is clearly different from our current scheme, which works quite
well for us.
More information about the pld-devel-en