[packages/glibc] - rel 4; more upstream git branch updates

Elan Ruusamäe glen at pld-linux.org
Thu May 19 09:50:14 CEST 2016


On 18.05.2016 16:32, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 18.05.2016 14:33, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> On 18.05.2016 14:18, arekm wrote:
>>> commit ee4a0bb9cd9a8e7f552c9948963a69c61865845c
>>> Author: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz<arekm at maven.pl>
>>> Date:   Wed May 18 13:16:40 2016 +0200
>>>
>>>      - rel 4; more upstream git branch updates
>
> any ideas how or why glibc update caused varnish compile failures (it 
> compiles it's .vcl files to .c -> .so)
>
> # service varnish checkconfig
> Checking Varnish HTTP accelerator 
> configuration...........................................................................................................................................................................................................[ 
> FAIL ]
> Command failed with error code 106
> Message from C-compiler:
> /usr/bin/ld: 
> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pld-linux/5.2.0/../../../../lib64/crti.o: 
> unrecognized relocation (0x2a) in section `.init'
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Running C-compiler failed, exit 1
> VCL compilation failed
> Message from C-compiler:
> /usr/bin/ld: 
> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pld-linux/5.2.0/../../../../lib64/crti.o: 
> unrecognized relocation (0x2a) in section `.init'
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Running C-compiler failed, exit 1
>
> seems simple compilation fails now:
>
> # echo 'int main() {}' > a.c
> # gcc a.c -o test
> /usr/bin/ld: 
> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pld-linux/4.9.3/../../../../lib64/crti.o: 
> unrecognized relocation (0x2a) in section `.init'
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
>
> happened after packages update:
>
> Wed May 18 09:57:49 2016 tzdata-2016d-1.noarch
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-devel-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-devel-utils-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-headers-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-libcrypt-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 glibc-misc-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 iconv-2.23-2.x86_64
> Wed May 18 09:59:02 2016 ldconfig-2.23-2.x86_64
>
> other relevant packages:
>
> # pkgbytime gcc
> Mon Sep 14 17:48:10 2015 gcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64
> Mon Sep 14 17:48:10 2015 libgcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64
>
> # pkgbytime binutils
> Mon Sep 14 17:48:10 2015 binutils-2.25.51.0.2-1.x86_64
> Mon Sep 14 17:48:10 2015 binutils-libs-2.25.51.0.2-1.x86_64
>
> previous glibc version was:
> # rpm -q --blink glibc
> glibc-2.23-2.x86_64
> glibc-2.23-2.x86_64.rpm
>        <= glibc-2.23-1.x86_64.rpm
>
>

it's broken with glibc-2.23-4.x86_64.rpm as well, but not with 
glibc-2.23-1.x86_64.rpm


maybe add conflicts: gcc < 6:5.0 to glibc package so such breakage won't 
bring down another system.
but i'd like to know what caused this. it makes no sense.




-- 
glen



More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list