RFC: shell completions policy change?

[Jan Palus]

On 14.07.2022 16:38, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> As more and more packages are getting bash/zsh completions, separate
> completions packages are becoming useless (harder to find, even not suggested).
> 
> My proposal:
> 1) add %{bash_compdir}, %{zsh_compdir} and maybe %{fish_compdir} (and upper
> level) dirs to filesystem package and package bash/zsh[/fish] completion
> files just with commands (existing bash-/zsh-[/fish-] packages to be merged and
> obsoleted). [preferred]
> Fortunately completion files don't have shebangs, which would generate
> bash/zsh dependencies.

Never had an issue with finding completions but I'm all for less
subpackages so +1.

> 2) at least add Suggests for completions packages in packages with
> commands to complete
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en